[Smeagol-discuss] Smeagol-discuss Digest, Vol 15, Issue 9
ambavale sagar
sagarambavale at yahoo.co.in
Thu Mar 19 14:12:28 GMT 2009
Dear Xiaohong,
You are correct. There is no constraint that your k-point mesh for transport calculation in scattering file and k-point mesh for density matrix calculation in the same scattering file must be same.
But I could not see the any special parameter for defining different
k-point mesh for density matrix and transport calculation in the same
scattering file.
On the other way it is necessary to have k-pt mesh in x-y direction same in leads file and for density matrix calculation in scattering file. So I answered like that..
Hope Ivan will correct me If there is something wrong in my understanding..
Regards
Sagar Ambavale
--- On Thu, 19/3/09, Xiaohong Zheng <exhzheng at gmail.com> wrote:
From: Xiaohong Zheng <exhzheng at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Smeagol-discuss] Smeagol-discuss Digest, Vol 15, Issue 9
To: "ambavale sagar" <sagarambavale at yahoo.co.in>
Cc: smeagol-discuss at lists.tchpc.tcd.ie
Date: Thursday, 19 March, 2009, 6:40 PM
Hello, Sagar,
I have a different idea about setting up the k points for the lead and transport calculations. Several days ago, I tried to set different k points for the lead and transport along x and y directions, the calculations went on very well. Then how to understand this if it is a requirement for the numbers of k points along x and y directions to be the same in both lead and transport calculations?
>From the discussions of ATK manual, the transport calculation will use the same k mesh as the lead for the density matrix, but a different k mesh for transmission can be specified. Can we or how can we set a different k mesh for the transmission calculations in Smeagol? Shall the k mesh for both the density matrix and the transmission be exactly the same?
Best,
Xiaohong
ambavale sagar wrote:
> Dear Serhan,
> Yes, number of k-points in z-direction must be 1. While no. of k pts in x and y direction may have any values though they should be same in both lead and transport calculations.
>
> if you may have k-points for leads
> 4 0 0
> 0 4 0
> 0 0 100
>
> then transport file must have
> 4 0 0
> 0 4 0
> 0 0 1
>
>
> Regards
> Sagar Ambavale
>
>
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 06:15:24 +0200
> From: Serhan Yamacli <syamacli at gmail.com
> </mc/compose?to=syamacli at gmail.com>>
> Subject: [Smeagol-discuss] End of file reached
> To: smeagol-discuss at lists.tchpc.tcd.ie
> </mc/compose?to=smeagol-discuss at lists.tchpc.tcd.ie>
> Message-ID:
> <42e7de20903172115r7f29711fk529eb6a761686679 at mail.gmail.com
> </mc/compose?to=42e7de20903172115r7f29711fk529eb6a761686679 at mail.gmail.com>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi asa,
>
> Thank you very much for the answer. Must I use the k points as
>
> 1 0 0
> 0 1 0
> 0 0 1
>
> always during transport calculation? But I can take such as
>
> 1 0 0
> 0 1 0
> 0 0 100
>
> during leads calculation? Thanks again.
>
> Cheers
> Serhan
>
> 2009/3/18 asa aravindh <mails2asa at gmail.com
> </mc/compose?to=mails2asa at gmail.com>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Get perfect Email ID for your Resume. Get before others grab. <http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_dbid_9/*http://in.promos.yahoo.com/address>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Smeagol-discuss mailing list
> Smeagol-discuss at lists.tchpc.tcd.ie
> http://lists.tchpc.tcd.ie/listinfo/smeagol-discuss
Get perfect Email ID for your Resume. Grab now http://in.promos.yahoo.com/address
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.tchpc.tcd.ie/pipermail/smeagol-discuss/attachments/20090319/8e4474b0/attachment.html
More information about the Smeagol-discuss
mailing list