[Smeagol-discuss] Doubts about Fortran

Mauro Suga mauro.suga at gmail.com
Tue Jul 14 10:16:35 IST 2009


Dear folks,

I am literally becoming crazy with fortran problems. Who knows, may be
anybody might clarify the doubts I have...

Well, going to the problem, I am using *pgf95* in order to compile a program
and I have been encountering several issues:

PGF90-S-0310-Illegal statement in the specification part of a MODULE
(module_sf_urban.f90: 238)
PGF90-S-0310-Illegal statement in the specification part of a MODULE
(module_sf_urban.f90: 239)
PGF90-S-0310-Illegal statement in the specification part of a MODULE
(module_sf_urban.f90: 240)
PGF90-S-0310-Illegal statement in the specification part of a MODULE
(module_sf_urban.f90: 241)
PGF90-S-0310-Illegal statement in the specification part of a MODULE
(module_sf_urban.f90: 242)
PGF90-S-0310-Illegal statement in the specification part of a MODULE
(module_sf_urban.f90: 243)
PGF90-S-0310-Illegal statement in the specification part of a MODULE
(module_sf_urban.f90: 244)

This report correponds to the following lines.

      DO II = 1,IXY
      DO M1 = 1,MW
      DO M2 = 1,KDIV + 1
      TTS_N0(M1,M2) = TTS_N(II,M1,M2)
      TTS_E0(M1,M2) = TTS_E(II,M1,M2)
      TTS_S0(M1,M2) = TTS_S(II,M1,M2)
      TTS_W0(M1,M2) = TTS_W(II,M1,M2)


However, I don't see a major problem here...what may be the cause of the
problem?

Best regards!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.tchpc.tcd.ie/pipermail/smeagol-discuss/attachments/20090714/5ff3965d/attachment.html 


More information about the Smeagol-discuss mailing list